My comment:
(a) Skip the first half. Ms 何 knows nothing more about 周薄's 政治罪, than you and I.
(b) What is intriguing is the second half, about Mr Zeng Qinghong. In fact, Ms 何 does not say anything novel. Rather, she brings developments to our attention.
(i) "中纪委刊发的那篇《大清 '裸官' 庆亲王的作风问题》，据《上海观察》介绍，作者 '习骅同志实际工作地点为中央纪委监察部驻国家新闻出版广电总局纪检组监察局，' 他写的文章并非 '闲笔.'“
洪俊杰, 上海观察, Feb 27, 2015.
web.shobserver.com/news/detail?id=3865
(A) "克罗齐说过，一切历史都是当代史。" Where does the quotation come from? What does it mean?
(B) Benedetto Croce (1866－1952; Italian)
(C) Though in the Web it is common to find him as saying, "All history is contemporary history." The official translation (authorized by Mr Croce) in English is, "[E]very true history is contemporary history."
The latter appeared in
Benedetto Croce, History; Its theory and practice. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co, 1921 (authorized translation by Douglas Ainslie; the Italian original was published in 1917)
The English quotation was reportedly at p 317.
(D) The meaning of this quotation is quite consistent among many English-language writers in the Web. (It does not mean history is written by a victor.) For example,:
Francis G Couvares et al (eds), Interpretations of American History, Vol I: Patterns and Perspectives. 7th ed. New York: The Free Press, 2000, pages 1-2 and n 1
books.google.com/books?id=DVNhXPy6suoC&pg=PA1&lpg=PA1&dq=every+true++history+is+contemporary+history+History;+Its+theory+and+practice&source=bl&ots=sL-rKg5OP9&sig=aaZOqgmVfoHDSafFvvLd7Of15gI&hl=en&sa=X&ei=mZwNVf_CL4yrNvHXgLgN&ved=0CDkQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=every true history is contemporary history History%3B Its theory and practice&f=false
("History rather reflects the need of historians (and readers) to make sense of their [historians'] own worlds. * * * View sof the past vary not only with generations but also because of divergent experiences stemming from ths historian's sex, ethnicity, class, and race. This does not mean that we cannot find out anything solid about the past. But it does mean that no account of the past is free of teh perspectives, prejudices, and priorities of its author")
This link can NOT open. I tried the cache of Google, Bing, Yahoo and Baidu, none of which can open, either. The text of the interview mentions 三个代表 only once (right before the heading 对话施芝鸿, that appeared very early in this piece):
which is exactly the 导读 in 澎湃网. Many Chinese-language media outlets republished this piece, but none of which republished 导读 (and it is hard to find that paragraph at issue, in the lengthy interview).
The 导读 before and after (at Paper.cn)--both on the same day: Mar 3, 2015--appear in
骆亚, 曾庆红秘书两会罕将 '三个代表' 对阵 '四个全面.' 大纪元, Mar 3, 2015.
m.epochtimes.com/article.php?url=/gb/15/3/3/n4378560