标题: World Muslims To Avenge Uighurs Against PRC [打印本页] 作者: choi 时间: 7-14-2009 10:59 标题: World Muslims To Avenge Uighurs Against PRC 本文通过一路BBS站telnet客户端发布
基地组织誓言为新疆维族死者复仇. VOA Chinese, July 14, 2009.
http://www.voanews.com/chinese/2009-07-14-voa49.cfm
(“与此同时， 在印度尼西亚首都雅加达，一些穆斯林举行抗议， 呼吁进行圣战，支持中国新疆的维吾尔人。”)
-----------Separately
(1) Kathrin Hille, Han survey the wreckage of illusory integration; Ethnic Chinese say they are as much the victims in Xinjiang as the Uighurs. Financial Times, July 13, 2009.
Quote:
“In the wake of foreign media accounts of Han retaliation last Tuesday, which was not reported in China’s state media, and analysis and comment on the failure of Beijing’s minorities policies, some sections of the Chinese media have accused foreign journalists of a bias in favour of the Uighurs.
“’The western media’s bias will make them lose China,’ said the Global Times, a tabloid owned by the People’s Daily, the Communist party’s mouthpiece, on Friday.
(2) Keith Bradsher, Drawing Critics, China Seeks to Dominate in Renewable Energy. New York Times, July 14, 2009.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/14/business/energy-environment/14energy.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=bradsher%20solar%20&st=cse
Quote:
“China has built the world’s largest solar panel manufacturing industry by exporting over 95 percent of its output to the United States and Europe. But when China authorized its first solar power plant this spring, it required that at least 80 percent of the equipment be made in China.
“When the Chinese government took bids this spring for 25 large contracts to supply wind turbines, every contract was won by one of seven domestic companies. All six multinationals that submitted bids were disqualified on various technical grounds, like not providing sufficiently detailed data. This spring, the Chinese government banned virtually any installation of wind turbines with a capacity of less than 1,000 kilowatts — excluding 850-kilowatt designs, a popular size for European manufacturers.
“Turbines from Chinese-owned companies tend to have slightly lower purchase prices than foreign-brand turbines, but have higher repair costs, so * * * the Chinese-brand turbines produce less electricity because they are more frequently out of action.
“World Trade Organization rules ban countries from using local content requirements to force companies like the wind turbine manufacturers to set up factories in a country instead of exporting to it.
(3) 林楠森, 台法院再度延押前总统陈水扁. BBC Chinese, July 13, 2009.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/chinese/simp/hi/newsid_8140000/newsid_8148900/8148908.stm
(4) Face value: Upwardly mobile; Peter Chou wants to turn HTC, which used to make mobile phones for other firms, into a brand in its own right. Economist, Kuly 11, 2009 (cover date).
http://www.economist.com/people/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13984299
-- 作者: choi 时间: 7-15-2009 11:29 标题: Re: World Muslims To Avenge Uighurs Against PRC 本文通过一路BBS站telnet客户端发布
Edward Wong, Fuse of Fear, Lit in China, Has Victims on 2 Sides. New York Times, July 14, 2009.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/13/world/asia/13uighur.html?_r=1&scp=7&sq=xinjiang&st=cse
(Urumqi police turned away a Uighur victim of ethnic attack)
------------
Yesterday I did not have time to COMMENT about ex-president Chen.
The news is attached at the bottom.
Lex column, A Chinese Hu-dunit. Financial Times, July 11, 2009.
My comment: Financial Times never allows a nonsubscriber to read the Lex column online, somehow. But this one is related to the circumstances in Taiwan. Although China President Hu Jintao was reported to have personally approved the arrest, the Hu in the title refers to Mr. Stern Hu of Rio Tinto, not President Hu.
Quote from the article:
"Six days of obfuscation [from the July 5 arrest to July 10 when Mr. Stern Hu was allowed consular access from Australia] confirms China is ill at ease with its new status as the world's most watched economy. * * * It [Beijing] has since issued a warning to Australia not to politicise the affair. Beijing wouldn't have to do this if the basis for the detention has been clearer from the outset. if authorities really had 'established the evidence' before they took action, as claimed on Thursday [July 9], where was the harm in saying so? If this is part of a broader investigation into kickbacks between foreign traders and Chinese mills, as rumoured, why not make that clear?
The portion about "where was the harm in saying so [in politicising the affair]" apply equally to Chen's case. In US, a detainee does not lose constitutional rights; he is not convicted and presumed innocent.
============
(3) 林楠森, 台法院再度延押前总统陈水扁. BBC Chinese, July 13, 2009.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/chinese/simp/hi/newsid_8140000/newsid_8148900/8148908.stm