本帖最后由 choi 于 5-14-2018 16:48 编辑
(1) Matthew Campbell and Prudence Ho with Dong Lyu and Christian Baumgaertel, What Will Be Left of HNA
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/a ... eft-of-hna-s-empire
Quote:
"HNA Group Co rose from provincial obscurity to becoming perhaps China's most acquisitive global company * * * An annual report released in late April [see quotation 3 for description of the report] revealed that HNA spent more on interest than any nonfinancial company in Asia last year, a $5 billion bill that represented a more than 50 percent increase from the year before. A sprawling conglomerate with roots in a middling regional airline that was founded on China's sleepy, tropical Hainan Island, HNA carried a total of $94 billion in debt at the end of 2017, a hangover from a dizzying global acquisition spree
"says Ja Ian Chong, an associate professor of political science at the National University of Singapore[:] 'The thing about China, and Chinese firms like HNA, is that no one is entirely sure what will come next.' The woes began last summer, when Chinese regulators asked banks to disclose exposures to HNA and four other highly acquisitive companies including Anbang Insurance Group Co., which has since been seized by the government. The requests to lenders signaled decreasing tolerance in Beijing for unfettered dealmaking. Some state-owned Chinese banks stopped extending loans to HNA,
"Although HNA isn't publicly traded, the annual report it just released contains selective financial information that reveals how overstretched the banks’ pullback has left the company. Overall debt rose 21 percent in 2017, according to the report * * * Nonetheless, HNA * * * isn't at risk of immediate catastrophe. At the start of 2018, according to people familiar with the matter, it told creditors it would sell about $16 billion in assets in the first half to lighten its balance sheet. Happily for the banks that financed its rise, HNA is already nearing that goal, thanks largely to the Hilton sale.
"What sets HNA apart from the countless companies that have overextended themselves is its opaque ownership structure. Officially HNA is controlled by its employees and a pair of charities named for Cihang, a mythical Chinese deity—one based in China and the other in New York.
Note:
(a) summary underneath the title in print: After a global acquisition binge, the Chinese conglomerate found that its earnings didn't cover its hefty debt payment.
(b) Print and online version are the same.
(c) About the last quotation. The two charities are
(i) Hainan Province Cihang Charity Foundation 海南省慈航公益基金会 and
(ii) Hainan Cihang Charity Foundation, Inc (based in New York City).
This is the first time I hear of 慈航真人
https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-cn/慈航真人
|