(c) “Any fluorescent light generates sound.”
(i) Solid-State Lighting for Submarines. Office of Naval Research, US Navy, undated
www.onr.navy.mil/en/Media-Center ... ing-Submarines.aspx
("Operational bulb life lasts for up to 50,000 hours compared to fluorescent (up to 7,500 hours for the T8W5 fixtures) and incandescent (up to 1,000 hours) bulbs. * * * The existing fluorescent lighting systems aboard submarines and surface warships are maintenance intensive. * * * A request was submitted to Office of Naval Research (ONR) TechSolutions by a sonar technician at the Commander, Submarine Force, Atlantic Fleet, Norfolk, Va., to replace noisy fluorescent bunk lights with LEDs")
(ii) acoustic quieting
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acoustic_quieting
(one subheading is "Underwater acoustics" under section 2.3 Quieting for specific observers)
does not help.
(iii) I googled, and the noise generated by fluorescent light is “humming.” Yes, some fluorescent light hum, but for a layperson like me, I do not know how a seemingly quiet fluorescent light sounds with sonar.
(d) "Vice Adm Robert Thomas, commander of the US Navy’s 7th Fleet, reportedly said Oct. 24 in Tokyo that then-Australian Defense Minister David Johnston was very interested in Japan’s Soryu-class subs. 'I talked to him about it four years ago and I said: "You want to find the finest diesel-electric submarine made on the planet — it’s made at Kobe works in Japan,"[‘] Thomas was quoted as saying by Bloomberg News."
The quotation is from
Jason Scott and Isabel Reynolds, Australia Mulls Japan Submarines Under China’s Cautious Gaze. Bloomberg, Dec 18, 2014.
www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-12-1 ... rehensive-gaze.html
, but there is no need to read the rest of the Bloomberg news.
|