(3) The economics of cow ownership | Udder People’s Money. Cattle may be a terrible investment but a decent savings vehicle.
http://www.economist.com/news/fi ... hicle-udder-peoples
Quote:
(a) "IN INDIA there are about 280m cows. They produce valuable things—milk, dung and calves. But cattle are expensive to keep. The biggest outlay is food—the average cow consumes fodder worth about 10,000 rupees ($160) a year. Veterinary costs also add up.
"These expenses are so high that cows are often a poor investment. According to a new and splendidly titled NBER paper, which looks at cow and buffalo ownership in rural areas of northern India, the average return on a cow is -64% once you factor in the cost of labour.
(b) "The paper has implications for poverty-alleviation strategies and for financial services in developing countries. Aid programmes that try to reduce poverty by distributing livestock may be ineffective at raising incomes, if the returns from owning them are so poor.
Note:
(a) There is no need to read the rest of the article.
(b) The paper at issue:
Santosh Anagol, Alvin Etang and Dean Karlan, Continued Existence of Cows Disproves Central Tenets of Capitalism? NBER, Sept 11, 2013 (working paper No 19437)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w19437
(abstract: "when valuing labor at market wages, households earn large, negative average returns [-64%] from holding cows * * * if we value the household’s own labor at zero, in which case estimated average returns for cows is negative 6%")
(c) Why does the subtitle say cattle ownership is "a decent savings vehicle." Economist states, "Compared with money held in savings accounts, cattle are illiquid assets." That should be a disadvantage for cattle owners. But "only 7% of Indian villages have a bank branch." With cash in hand, one (who is not disciplined) may be tempted to spend it. And that is what the subtitle means.
|