(6) Tim Culpan, Investors Say HTC Ain’t Worth Squat.
www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/ ... c-ain-t-worth-squat
Quote:
“It [HTC] was briefly No 1 in the US [in 2011] * * * On Aug 10, a further plunge left HTC’s value at $1.5 billion, slightly below the amount of cash it has on hand—meaning investors are saying its brand, facilities, and designs are worthless. ‘Cash is the only asset of value. You can’t really assess any value on the rest of the company,’ says Calvin Huang 黄文堯, an analyst at SinoPac Financial Holdings 永豐金控 [based in Taipei]. ‘HTC’s climb to the top made management too confident, with its ego leading to a string of mistakes in product design, marketing, pricing, and distribution.’
"Richard Ko, an analyst for KGI Securities 凱基證券 [also based in Taipei] * * * estimates, HTC will be out of cash within three years. Says Ko: 'They have to stop the bleeding.'
My comment:
(a) There is no need to read the rest.
(b) Check a, any, dictionary and it will say squat is a slang, a noun meaning “the least amount, anything at all.” But why? Lokk deeper, dictionaries will say it is shortened from another slang (noun) “diddly-squat.” Why?
Google with the term (diddly-squat etymology) --without quotation marks -- and Google ITSELF tells you, at the top of the search result: “mid 20th century: probably from slang doodle ‘excrement’ + squat in the sense ‘defecate.’
|