吴弘达用钱 + 理财产品: NYT

choi

(1) 杰安迪, 人权基金还是私人金库？吴弘达遗产蒙上污点. 纽约时报, Aug 15, 2016
http://cn.nytimes.com/usa/201608 ... a-tarnished-legacy/

, which is translated from

Andrew Jacobs, Champion of Human Rights in China Leaves Tainted Legacy Over Finances. New York Times, Aug 14, 2016.

two consecutive paragraphs:

"His [Harry Wu's] close relationship with lawmakers helped Mr Wu secure a $17 million grant from Yahoo in 2007 to aid families of persecuted dissidents, when the tech giant was facing withering criticism for assisting the Chinese authorities in identifying activists who had used the company's email service.

"But by the time Mr Wu, 79, died in April, his legacy had become tarnished. He provided just $1.2 million to dissidents' families, while spending more than $13 million of the Yahoo money to operate his own foundation, which runs a website and a small museum, according to financial disclosures, court documents and interviews with former employees, foundation board members and human rights advocates.

(2) Keith Bradsher, 理财产品威胁中国金融体系：缺乏监管、不透明. 纽约时报, Aug 15, 2016
http://cn.nytimes.com/business/2 ... ts-pose-china-risk/

, which is translated from

Keith Bradsher, A Flood of Money, but to Where?  China pours $2.8 trillion into investments long on promises but short on details. New York Times, Aug 13, 2016.
(In wealth management products of China: "There is just one catch: Investors know surprisingly little about what they are buying")

My comment: There is no need to read the rest of teh text (except the quotation above).