一路 BBS

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
查看: 1233|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Hard to Tell Which Predictions Will Materialize

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 5-3-2010 15:36:18 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
本文通过一路BBS站telnet客户端发布

(1) Shiyin Chen and Haslinda Amin, China May ‘Crash’ in Next 9 to 12
Months, Faber Says. Bloomberg, May 3, 2010.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601010&sid=aMbfBKW.uKn4

My comment:
(a) Marc Faber
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Faber
(born in 1946 in Zurich; best known for the Gloom Boom & Doom Report
newsletter)
(b) If you read news accounts about Mr. Faber for the past several months,
he sounds more and more pessimistic about China. However,in this Bloomberg
report, his forecast of "crash" basically cites Chanos.

(2) Robert Fogel, $123,000,000,000,000*
*China’s estimated economy by the year 2040. Be warned.
Foreign Policy, January/February, 2010.
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/01/04/123000000000000

(a) In the cover of that issue, this teaser:

The $123 Trillion Economy
Nobel Laureate Robert Fogel on China's Future

(b) Excerpt in the window of article in the print:

Most accounts of China's economic ascent actually underestimate the extent
of the rise--by a lot.

(c) My comment: I will laugh out loud but for Nobel prize of the author. In
2009, China's nominal GDP (according to exchange rate) was $4.8 trillion,
and its GDP (PPP), $8.8 trillion. CIA World Factbook. How can China's
economy shoot up 40 times in 30 years? Even factoring inflation in, it can
not be $123 trillion. I read the article, and the author did not explain how
he came up with the number.
(d) The Foreign Policy magazine had a rebuttal online--but not in the print,
as it does not show up in March/April issue.

Nicholas Consonery, A $123 Trillion China? Not Likely. The many, many
reasons -- from the financial crisis to the country's aging population to
environmental limitations -- why Robert Fogel's forecast for China is
completely inconceivable. Foreign Policy, Jan. 7, 2010 (online only).
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/01/07/a_123_trillion_china_not_likely

Please read only the LAST FOUR paragraph, starting with "But the most
important reason why we won't see 1.4 billion Chinese earning an average of
$85,000 per year is simply that the Earth can't sustain such rapid growth."

Multiply 1.4 billion by $85,000 and we get $119 Trillion--almost $123
Trillion.



--
回复

使用道具 举报

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 5-3-2010 16:36:04 | 只看该作者

Re: Hard to Tell Which Predictions Will Materialize

本文通过一路BBS站telnet客户端发布

国际投资大师预测中国经济崩溃. VOA Chinese, May 3, 2010 (1 hour ago).
http://www1.voanews.com/chinese/news/china/Faber-Chinese-economy-20100503-92726129.html
("史剑道认为,麦嘉华、查诺斯、罗格夫等人关于中国房地产市场存在巨大泡沫威胁的判断是正确的。他说,中国房地产市场的回落的确会导致大宗商品价格的下降。但是,房市的矫正不足以导致经济衰退")

【 在 choi 的大作中提到: 】
: (1) Shiyin Chen and Haslinda Amin, China May ‘Crash’ in Next 9 to 12
: Months, Faber Says. Bloomberg, May 3, 2010.
: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601010&sid=aMbfBKW.uKn4
: My comment:
: (a) Marc Faber
: (以下引言省略...)

--
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表