(15) “Robert would finally force England to acknowledge Scotland's independence in 1328, a year before he died, with the Treaty of Edinburgh-Northampton—¬although new wars would soon begin between England and Scotland, and these turned out less well for Scotland: The battle of Dupplin Moor (1332), Halidon Hill (1333), Neville's Cross (1346) and especially Flodden Field (1513) were all debacles for the smaller nation, although it remained independent until the English and Scottish crowns united in 1603, following the death of Elizabeth I and the ascension of James I (James VI of Scotland). The 1707 Act of Union finally brought open borders and prosperity, and as a consequence Scottish culture flourished in ways the nation's 17th-century inhabitants could not have imagined. But Scottish culture never fully assimilated—the court system and established Presbyterian church remained separate, for instance—and in many ways that is the consequence of what Bruce achieved in 1314.”
(a) Treaty of Edinburgh-Northampton
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Edinburgh%E2%80%93Northampton
(b) Battle of Flodden
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Flodden
(table)
(16) “Which is why the Battle of Bannockburn, as Robert Crawford contends in ‘Bannockburns: Scottish Independence and the Literary Imagination, 1314-2014,’ has been a constant presence in the literature of Scotland for hundreds of years. Mr Crawford, a professor of literature at St Andrews and an avowedly nationalist poet, offers insightful and highly literate analyses of a wide variety of works: ‘The Bruce,’ [mentioned in (13)] Blind Harry's ‘The Wallace’ (1477), Robert Burns's ‘Scots Wha Hae wi' Wallace Bled’ (1793), little-known but once popular novels like Jane Porter's ‘Scottish Chiefs’ (1810), and an array of novels and poems by 20th-century Scottish writers, among them Alasdair Gray and Edwin Morgan. Mr. Crawford's survey of Scottish literature in ‘Bannockburns,’ though, is less comprehensive than his admittedly excellent history of Scottish literature, the 800-page ‘Scotland's Books’ (2007). Many important writers are dismissed or ignored in ‘Bannockburns’ because they exhibited no nationalist leanings, while less important writers receive lavish treatment. Robert Louis Stevenson gets barely a mention. The poems and novels of Walter Scott—the nation's most influential writer but a zealous unionist—get politely ushered out of the discussion.”
(a)
(i) Blind Harry
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_Harry
(ii) John Balaban, Blind Harry and 'The Wallace.' The Chaucer Review, 8: 241-251 (1974)
www.jstor.org/stable/25093271
(Sentence 1: “The tradition is that the author of Schir William Wallace was one Blind Harry a wandering minstrel, an aged bard who, blind from birth, earned his living singing common tales in 'native woodnotes,' as it were, before men of high station")
(b)
(i) Scots Wha Hae
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scots_Wha_Hae
(English: Scots, Who Have; written in the Scots language which served for centuries as an unofficial national anthem of the country, but has lately been largely supplanted by Scotland the Brave [qv; lyrics written in 1950] and Flower of Scotland”)
(ii) Marvin McAllister, Transnational Balladeering: 'Scots, What Hae Wi' Wallace Bled' in 1820s Afro-New York. Stidies in Scottish Literature, 38: 109-118, at 111
scholarcommons.sc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1508&context=ssl
(explaining “this opening stanza”)
|