(4) “Railways cut deep through the Russian psyche, and train journeys are woven into the nation’s cultural life. They tell its story in ways large and small. A kink in the railway line from Moscow to St Petersburg, for example, is where—or so it is said—Tsar Nicholas I’s finger got in the way of his ruler 尺 when he drew a line between the cities. Whatever the truth of that, over the centuries railways have represented the will of an authoritarian ruler, the supremacy of state power, the boom of private capital, the modernisation of the country, the terror of Stalinism and the mania for ruinous grand projects of Soviet times. All Russian history is there.
(a) Saint Petersburg – Moscow Railway
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Petersburg_–_Moscow_Railway
(section 3 History)
(b) Nicholas I of Russia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicholas_I_of_Russia
(1796 – 1855; Emperor of Russia 1825 - 1855)
* Nicholas II of Russia is the last emperor.
(5) “Sergei Witte, the railway chief from the time of Alexander III, saw trains as ‘social mixers.’ ‘A railway”, he wrote, ‘is a ferment that causes cultural brewing’ “
Alexander III of Russia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_III_of_Russia
(6) “These bringers of modernity [trains], like many others, had military roots. One of the first lines from Warsaw (then part of the Russian empire) to the border of Austria and Hungary, its strong ally, was used by Nicholas I to send Russian troops to help suppress a Hungarian rebellion in 1848. Lenin, who arrived from Germany by train to lead the Bolshevik revolution, considered railway stations, along with telegraphs, as major targets to be seized. After the revolution, armoured trains were used in the civil war by both sides: Trotsky turned one into his mobile headquarters. It is partly for defensive reasons, one theory goes, that Russian railway tracks have a wider gauge than European ones: whereas Russia could transport its troops to its borders, a train with foreign troops would not be able to roll into Russia. (To this day, a train journey from Russia to Europe involves a change of wheels.)
(a) “Warsaw (then part of the Russian empire)”
history of Warsaw
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Warsaw
(section 4 1795-1914: to Kingdom of Prussia in 1795; to Napoleon in 1806, “Following the Congress of Vienna of 1815, Warsaw became the center of the Congress Poland, a constitutional monarchy under a personal union with Imperial Russia [until 1915 when German army entered Warsaw)”)
(b) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Warsaw
("Growth of railways turned Warsaw into an important railways hub, as lines were opened to Vienna (1848), Saint Petersburg (1862), Bydgoszcz (1862), Terespol (1867), Kovel (1873), Mlava (1877), Kalisz (1902), along with several shorter lines")
(7) “The job of railways chief was one of the most important in the country. Witte was also chairman of the Russian council of ministers under Nicholas II; Trotsky, who held the job [railways chief, starting 1920] after the revolution, was also in charge of the Red Army [which he founded in 1918]. * * * What makes trains weigh so heavily on Russia’s consciousness is the sheer size of the land mass. European railway journeys, with their short distances between stations and the constant sight of human life outside the window, leave little time or space for thought or soul-searching. In Russia, however, train journeys are measured in days and nights rather than hours. It takes six days to travel from Moscow to Vladivostok, a distance of more than 9,000km. All one sees is forest, occasionally interrupted by a clearing or uncultivated fields cloaked, in winter, with snow. You can go for hours, sometimes days, without seeing a settlement or a soul.”
|