本帖最后由 choi 于 8-23-2018 12:46 编辑
(1) Lee Lawrence, A Trip Down the Yangzi in 49 Feet; Wang Hui's lengthy handscroll stirs emotions while evoking poetry, earlier paintings, history and cultural references. Wall Street Journal, Aug 23, 2018 (exhibition review)
https://www.wsj.com/articles/10- ... -gallery-1534971790
(a) Excerpt: The work, recently donated to the museum, casts nature as the protagonist
(b) Quote:
"Wang Hui (1632-1717) [清 (1644 to 1912)] * * * More than 40 feet of this 53-foot-long handscroll are unfurled in a desk-high display case running the length of the gallery, with a reproduction of the remaining portion hanging on the side wall. Even knowing that such scrolls should be viewed in segments of about three feet, the length one would unfurl in a single gesture * * *
"Although early paintings typically depict the river from its source in the Tibetan highlands to its outlet into the East China Sea, by the 17th century this convention had long been reversed. So Wang begins the journey near the mouth of the river in his native province of Suzhou, where in 1699, he painted this masterpiece. * * * The protagonist is unquestionably nature, not man, with mountain chains almost appearing animate thanks to Wang's 'dragon veins 龙脉.' * * * Moving right to left [of the handscroll], we see this play out in a number of configurations as the river narrows, widens and occasionally embraces a tributary.
"Born into a family of professional painters, Wang was not yet 20 when Wang Jiang and Wang Shimin, two highly regarded orthodox painters, took him under their wing, the latter inviting young Wang to study his collection of paintings. Which he did, spending years copying past masters, stroke by individual stroke. * * * At the home of [collector] Zhou Lianggong 收藏家周亮工 in Nanjing, for example, Wang saw Yan Wengui's 燕文贵 [(967-1044) vs 北宋(960—1127)] panoramic 'Landscape of the Yangzi River 长江卷' (sometime between 970 and 1030), which he cited as an inspiration for this painting.
Note: The review is available to the public. There is no need to read the rest (which is inane), though, because one should read the museum's descriptions. See next.
|