本文通过一路BBS站telnet客户端发布
(1) David A. Fulghum, New Chinese Ship-Based Fighter Progresses. Aviation Week, Apr 27, 2011.
http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_generic.jsp?channel=aerospacedaily&id=news/asd/2011/04/27/02.xml&headline=New%20Chinese%20Ship-Based%20Fighter%20Progresses
("Analysts and aircraft watchers in China say the aircraft’s first flight was made on Aug. 31, 2009, powered by a Russian-supplied AL-31. Ukraine is the source of China’s Su-33/Flanker D, U.S. analysts agree. 'Russia’s carrier training is done in Ukraine at Saki, and for years there was one of the first prototype Su-33s sitting there,' one of the analysts says.")
Note:
(a) Foreplane. Eurofighter typhone.
http://www.eurofighter.com/capabilities/technology/production/foreplane.html
Canard and foreplane are used interchangeably. And this comment is substanciated by paragraph 4 of this article ("The J-15’s canards replicate those on the Su-33").
(i) A canard is before the main wing,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canard_(aeronautics)
whereas a tailplane is behind the main wing.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tailplane
(see photo 2)
(ii) This is a MODEL of Su-33, which shows forplanes and folding wings (for main wing and tailpane).
http://precise3dmodeling.com/models/su33.html
(b) folding wings
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folding_wing
(a design feature of aircraft to save space in the airfield, and time, and is typical of naval aircraft that operate from the limited deck space of aircraft carriers; Short Brothers, the world's first aircraft manufacturer, developed and patented[1] folding wing mechanisms for ship-borne aircraft (Short Folder), the first patent being granted in 1913; The wings were hinged so that they folded back horizontally alongside the fuselage [see illustration]; A folding wing has disadvantages over a fixed wing. It will be heavier and have complex connections for electrical, fuel, aerodynamic and structural systems)
Quote: "Since the monoplane supplanted the biplane in the late 1930s, virtually all fixed-wing aircraft designed for shipboard duty have been equipped with folding wings. Notable exceptions include the SBD Dauntless, F2A Buffalo, and A4D/A-4 Skyhawk (all USN types) and the Sea Harrier (British). All four are relatively small designs.
* Please note: Folding wing is not "variable-sweep wing." See
wing configuration
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wing_configuration
(section 3.2 Wing sweep)
(c) head-up display
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Head-up_display
(The origin of the name stems from the pilots being able to view information with heads "up" and looking forward, instead of angled down looking at lower instruments)
(d) The report alludes to
Russia downplays Chinese J-15 fighter capabilities. Ria Novosti, June 4, 2010
http://en.rian.ru/mlitary_news/20100604/159306694.html
, which I brought to your attention at the time.
(e) low-rate initial production (LRIP)
(f) The article cites New York Times. See (2).
(g) The article mentions "a close-in (Club-type cruise missile) weapons system."
* close-in weapons system
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Close-in_weapon_system
(CIWS, often pronounced sea-whiz; Nearly all classes of modern warship are equipped with some kind of CIWS device; sections 1 Gun systems, 2 Missile systems)
* Russia has at least three types of Club cruise missiles: Club-K, -M, and -N.
(2) Michael Wine, Chinese State Media, in a Show of Openness, Print Jet Photos; Pictures suggest that the usually secretive People's Liberation Army is lifting some veils. New York Times, Apr 26, 2011.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/26/world/asia/26fighter.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=j-15&st=cse
Quote:
"Like the aircraft carrier it will call home, the jet [J-15] faces years of tests and refinement before it will formally enter service, military analysts say.
"But in 2001, the Chinese bought an Su-33 prototype from Ukraine, a former Soviet republic, and began a teardown to learn its secrets. The Russians were incensed.
"But Mr. Lan [Yun, an editor at the Beijing-based Modern Ships magazine] said it had a shorter range, in large part because its takeoff method — flying off a ski-jump-style runway — dictated that it could carry less fuel than a comparable American jet, which is propelled off a flat carrier runway.
My comment:
(a) Flying Shark 飞鲨
(b) The report states "Chinese interests" bought Varyag from Ukraine, "supposedly for conversion into a floating casino in Macao."
interest (n): "BUSINESS, COMPANY"
www.m-w.com
(c) Both Aviation Week and New York Times affirm the conventional wisdom that the carrier-based fighter (whatever it is called, J-15 or -18) will use skip-jump to take off, rather than vertical takeoff. Please recall just a week ago Beijing dismissed a vertical-takeoff fighter, J-18, as pure fantasy. It will lose crebility if it now reverses itself and says China indeed has vertical-takeoff, which is unlikely considering the facts China invarriably cloning Russia's stuff and that Russia failed to develop
V/STOL
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V/STOL
(Vertical and/or short take-off and landing (V/STOL; includes the Harrier, Yak-38 Forger and V-22 Osprey)
* Yakovlev Yak-38
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yakovlev_Yak-38
(NATO reporting name: Forger; Soviet Naval Aviation's first and only operational VTOL strike fighter aircraft)
--
|