Fortune, Dec 3, 2012

choi

(1)
(a) Brian Dumaine, Rethinking China's Cities. Urban desiner Peter Calthorpe is working to make the country's explosive growth more sustainable.
http://management.fortune.cnn.co ... horpe-china-cities/

Calthorpe says:

"The urban Chinese live in neighborhoods where buildings average 10 stories, whereas in America it's two stories.

"As the Chinese create more and more superblocks of apartments and giant shopping centers, they're destroying a whole stratum of their traditional walkable society. * * * Each superblock has repetitious, high-rise apartment towers with a total of around 5,000 units. My design is made up of small urban blocks with green courtyards, each having only 500 units, where you can walk or bike to eat and shop -- where neighbors can actually recognize one another. The buildings will vary from four stories to 30 stories. And this design will house the same number of people per acre while leaving enough open space for parks and greenways.

(b) 小亨利·M·保尔森, 中国必须采用全新的城市化途径. 纽约时报中文网, Dec 6, 2012.
http://cn.nytimes.com/article/opinion/2012/12/06/c06paulson/

, which is translated from

Henry M Paulson Jr, How Cities Can Save China; Smarter urban growth could help the country's environment. New York Times, Dec 5, 2012 (op-ed)
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/0 ... can-save-china.html
("Within city centers are countless “superblocks” — half-kilometer-square developments interspersed with huge boulevards that create monster traffic jams and skyrocketing pollution. In response, an approach that featured smaller blocks and mixed-use neighborhoods and accessible public transportation would alleviate these unintended consequences. Such 'livable cities' would balance economic development with energy efficiency, improve air quality and reduce congestion")

My comment:
(a) There is no need toread the rest of the English-language NYT article.
(b) The article introduces Mr Paulson as "a former chief executive of Goldman Sachs and Treasury secretary, is the chairman of the Paulson Institute [at University of Chicago]."

choi

(2) Joshua Cooper Ramo, Globalism Goes Backward. They forget to tell us globalization has a reverse gear. Now companies and countries need to get ready for the 'inside economy.'
http://finance.fortune.cnn.com/2 ... l-economy-backward/

(a) The only two mentions about China in this article

"For most of the past 20 years China's development was driven by opening to the outside and by low labor costs that made it the world's factory. But the next 10 years will be defined by fixing, urgently, its broken internal systems. As officials in Beijing noted last year when explaining their new five-year plan: 'The golden age of globalization may come to a halt.'

"We shouldn't be worrying so much now about losing our future to China and India -- countries that relied on outside-led growth for their economic muscle tone -- but rather about losing our future to our own inability to adjust.

(b) Excerpt in the window of print:
(i) Beijing's unsettling view: "The golden age of globalization may come to a halt."
(ii) Why does Silicon Valley grow? Its insider culture of cooperation.

(c) My comment:
(i) The mentions are ambiguious, so I do not really know what they mean.
(ii) There is no need to read the rest of the text.