(b) “Singapore, says Beh Swan Gin, chairman of the Economic Development Board 经济发展局 [a government agency], which promotes inward investment, is now seeking a ‘much more expansive role’ in the business activities of the firms located there—not just as an offshore manufacturing location but as home to many more of their functions.”
(i)
(A) 马宣仁医生 (Dr Beh Swan Gin) 局长 新加坡经济发展局 [EDB, August 2010]
www.edb.gov.sg/etc/medialib/imag ... of_Dr_Beh_Swan_Gin_(MD)_-_Aug2010.pdf
(B) The same EDB in another, all simplified Chinese (without English words) Web page states,
"马宣仁医生在2014年12月1日被委任为新加坡经济发展局主席。他也同时担任经济发展局投资有限公司的董事会主席。 * * * 马医生毕业于新加坡国立大学医学院。他是美国斯坦福大学的斯隆学者 [Sloan Fellow],并获颁该大学商学院的管理学理学硕士学位。马医生也完成了哈佛商学院的高级管理课程。"
(ii) Southern Min 闽南语
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Min
(section 4.2 Vocabulary: Horse -- 馬 -- Bey [pronunciation in 'Taiwanese Hokkien'])
My Taiwanese pronunciation for 馬 is "Mey." Somehow I observe my pronunciation is often at odd with (written) Taiwanese dictionaries edited by government or civilian (online) publishers, which are also at odds with one another.
(c) When it comes to domestic business, it is striking, in a country that boasts about keeping the state lean, how many of its most successful companies are ‘GLCs’ (‘government-linked’ [companies]) in which, through Temasek, the government has a substantial stake. They include DBS (the largest domestic bank); NOL (shipping); SingTel (telecoms); SMRT (public transport); ST Engineering (high-end engineering services); CapitaLand (property); Keppel (marine engineering, such as jack-up rigs, in which Singapore has a 70% global market share); and SembCorp (marine engineering and utilities).”
(i) For GLCs, see state-owned enterprise
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State-owned_enterprise
(section 4.8 Singapore)
Quote: "The term 'government-linked company' (GLC) is sometimes used to refer to corporate entities that may be private or public (listed on a stock exchange) where an existing government owns a stake using a holding company. There are two main definitions of GLCs are dependent on the proportion of the corporate entity a government owns. One definition purports that a company is classified as a GLC if a government owns an effective controlling interest (>50%), while the second definition suggests that any corporate entity that has a government as a shareholder is a GLC.
(ii) Difference, if any, with SOEs?
(A) Carlos D Ramírez and Ling Hui Tan, Singapore Inc versus the Private Sector: Are Government-Linked Companies Different? IMF Staff Papers (published by International Monetary Fund, 51: 510-528 (2004).
http://www.imf.org/External/Pubs/FT/staffp/2004/03/ramirez.htm
(abstract: “Government-linked companies (GLCs) have a significant presence in Singapore’s corporate sector. Unlike parastatals in many other countries, these companies are run on a competitive, commercial basis, ostensibly without government privileges. Based on data from publicly listed GLCs and non-GLCs, we indeed find no evidence that GLCs have easier access to credit. However, we do find that being a GLC is rewarded in financial markets with a positive premium, over and above what can be explained by the usual determinants of Tobin’s q”)
(B) Reforming China’s state-owned firms | From SOE to GLC. China’s rulers look to Singapore for tips on portfolio management. Economist, Nov 23, 2013
http://www.economist.com/news/fi ... -management-soe-glc
Quote:
“On the eve of the latest third plenum, held earlier this month, the Development Research Centre (DRC) 国务院发展研究中心, a government think-tank, advertised an ambitious set of reform proposals, including an overhaul of China’s inefficient state-owned enterprises (SOEs). Simply privatising these companies remains out of the question for China’s leaders. But there are alternatives, and Singapore provides one.
“The DRC’s plan named Temasek, a holding company for SOEs in Singapore, as a potential model. It was created in 1974, when it inherited 35 companies from the finance ministry. * * * Its [Temasek’s] domestic holdings are concentrated in what Singapore calls ‘government-linked companies’ (GLCs), such as Singapore Airlines (of which it owns 56%) and SingTel, a telecoms company (52%).
Temasek’s charter obliges it to increase the value of its holdings over the long term. This is a remarkably simple aim compared with the Chinese government’s manifold ambitions. It [China] wants its holdings to promote technological progress, favoured industries and national security, among other things.
As well as clarifying objectives, the Temasek model also allows the state to distance itself from the management of its enterprises, without relinquishing ownership. Temasek avoids meddling in the day-to-day running of the GLCs in its portfolio, which are free to hire professional managers at market rates. With a few exceptions, it does not directly appoint board members either.
“In judging the performance of Temasek’s GLCs, the counterfactual is important. They may not be as obviously successful as private titans from the region such as Samsung or LG. But they are not nearly as bad as most SOEs, including China’s.
(iii) DBS Bank
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DBS_Bank
(previously known as The Development Bank of Singapore Limited)
(iv) Neptune Orient Lines
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neptune_Orient_Lines
(NOL; section 1 History)
(v) SMRT Corporation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMRT_Corporation
(operates bus, rail, taxi)
SMRT stands for Singapore Mass Rapid Transit.
(vi) ST Engineering
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ST_Engineering
(Singapore Technologies Engineering)
(vii) Keppel Corporation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keppel_Corporation
(The name of the company Keppel was derived from a British ship captain, Captain Henry Keppel, who discovered a natural, deepwater harbour (the Keppel Harbour) in Tanjong Pagar [on the western bank of mouth of Singapore river] in 1848)
(viii) SembCorp Industries includes SembCorp Marine Ltd (ship repair, shipbuilding etc). |