本文通过一路BBS站telnet客户端发布
(1) Bill Gertz, Chinese satellite test. Washington Times, Sept. 2, 2010.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/sep/1/inside-the-ring-418710963/
("'Our analysts determined there are two Chinese satellites in close proximity of each other,' a [US] defense official told Inside the Ring")
(2) 中国在巴基斯坦北部边界引关注. VOA Chinese, Sept. 2, 2010.
http://www.voanews.com/chinese/news/20100902-Gilgit-Baltistan-Triangular-102060258.html
Note: The report cites
Selig S. Harrison, China's Discreet Hold on Pakistan's Northern Borderlands. International Herald Tribune (IHT), Aug. 27, 2010.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/27/opinion/27iht-edharrison.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=selig%20pakistan%20china&st=cse
IHT is a Paris-based subsidiary of New York Times Company.
(3) Phred Dvorak, Canada Burnishes Its Position as Arctic Power; As Northern Passageways Become Navigable and Mineral Wealth Beckons, Leaders Boost Claims With Expeditions, Sorties. Wall Street Journal, Aug. 31, 2010.
("The U.S. and other countries hold the passage is an international strait, meaning that even though Canada owns it, everyone should be free to go through. Canada calls it internal waters and argues that transiting ships and submarines must ask its permission to pass and obey its laws.")
My comment:
(a) Below this one in print, there was another report titled Failed Search Deepens Mystery of Vanished Explorers (shown up in the left column of the URL above). There is no need to read that one, which is about history.
(b) I highlighted the portion of the report that is relevant to the ongoing debates about South China Sea. China, on the other hand, has not come out to explicitly called it China's territorial waters; rather, it (China) has said since last April that South China Sea is "core interest" or "sovereignty indisputable."
--
|