(3)
(a) M142 HIMARS
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M142_HIMARS
(High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS); "The HIMARS carries six rockets or one MGM-140 ATACMS missile on the US Army's new Family of Medium Tactical Vehicles (FMTV) five-ton truck"/ table: Manufacturer Lockheed Martin, Operational range 480 km (298 mi), Accuracy Guided)
(b) MGM-140 ATACMS
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MGM-140_ATACMS
(Army Tactical Missile System (ATacMS); table: Maximum firing range 190 mi (300 km), Manufacturer Lockheed Martin, Launch platform M270 or HIMARS)
(c) 1963 United States Tri-Service missile and drone designation system
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/19 ... _designation_system
MGM stands for (M) Mobile (G) Surface-attack (M) Guided missile.
(4)
(a) Sam LaGrone, PACOM Commander Harris Wants the Army to Sink Ships, Expand Battle Networks. USNI News, Feb 21, 2017.
https://news.usni.org/2017/02/21 ... and-battle-networks
Quote:
" 'Before I leave PACOM, I'd like to see the Army’s land forces conduct exercises to sink a ship in a complex environment where our joint and combined forces are operating in other domains,' [Admiral Harry] Harris said during the West 2017 conference on Tuesday. * * * Harris then called for his Navy and Army forces commanders – Pacific Fleet commander Adm Scott Swift and US Army Pacific commander Gen Bob Brown – to work out how to tie the Army's land-based missile defense network into the Navy’s Naval Integrated Fire Control-Counter Air architecture. NIFC-CA – based around the US carrier strike group – creates a network of sensors and shooters to allow ships or aircraft to pass targeting information between several different weapon systems and platforms.
"While Harris was enthusiastic about inter-service battle networks merging, he stopped short of calling for a NIFC-CA level of connection with Japanese and South Korean forces. Both countries field – or are set to field – Aegis combat system-equipped ships and aircraft capable of bolting on to the U.S. Navy’s NIFC-CA construct and expanding its reach. When asked by USNI News, Harris declined to say if he wants to link the capabilities of the Japanese Self-Defense Forces and the South Korean military directly to the US NIFC-CA network.
(b) Gidget Fuentes, Marines Fire HIMARS From Ship in Sea Control Experiment With Navy. USNI News, Oct 24, 2017
https://news.usni.org/2017/10/24 ... rol-experiment-navy
("A detachment of Marines with Camp Pendleton, Calif.-based 5th Battalion, 11th Marines, set up the vehicle-borne launch system on the flight deck of amphibious transport dock USS Anchorage (LPD-23). * * * Target destroyed, officials said")
However, what the target was, and where (on the sea or ashore) was not explained.
(c) In the July 12, 2018 Sinking Exercise (SINKEX), US Army participated in RIMPAC for the first time and fired HIMARS from the shore of Kauai, Hawaii, allegedly hitting the target -- a stationary, decommissioned USS Racine, 55 nautical miles away. Other participants were US Navy and Japan's self-defense forces.
Note: To use ATACMS or HIMARS against ships, US Army has modified these missiles since 2016. Still, (4)(c) appears to be the only one successful report so far for HIMARS, although www.thedrive.com cast doubt on July 26, 2018, because "all the HIMARS rounds were Reduced Range Practice Rounds, known as RRPR rounds" whose manufacturer Lockheed Martin in its website said has a maximal range of 15km. (There has been no news report of testing ATACMS in anti-ship exercise.) In any event, the American stories are just like China boasting of DF-21 as a killer of an aircraft carrier, despite the fact that a target ship is usually moving, if not zigzagging.
|